‘Go to Iran’ Jibe by Army Chief Ignites Outrage, Shias Cry Targeting

Islamabad: A new controversy has arisen after a high-profile Iftar meeting in Pakistan. Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and the country's leading Shia Ulema had attended this meeting held on March 19, but now sharp reactions are emerging regarding this meeting. It is alleged that the conversation during the meeting was one sided and the Ulemas were not given adequate opportunity to express their views, due to which the matter has become an issue of national debate.

What was the real reason for the dispute?

According to sources, a statement of the army chief in the meeting is at the center of the controversy. It is being claimed that he said, “If you are so fond of Iran, then you should go there.” The Shia community has taken this comment as questioning their patriotism. Since then, resentment seems to be increasing in religious circles.

How was the atmosphere in the meeting?

People present in the meeting say that only the army chief kept speaking for about an hour and the opportunity for communication was very limited. Some Ulema indicated that they tried to present their views but were interrupted. A hint was given for another meeting after dinner, but that too could not take place due to the sudden departure of the army chief.

What objection did Shia Ulema raise?

Maulana Hasnain Abbas Gardeji described such language as inappropriate for a constitutional post. Whereas Allama Nazir Abbas Taqvi says that an atmosphere of dialogue was not allowed to be created. The Ulema also said that the Shia community has played an important role in the creation of Pakistan, hence it is wrong to question their loyalty.

Why did the issue of religious affiliation versus patriotism arise?

Shia leaders say that emotional attachment to religious places like Mecca, Medina, Iraq and Iran is natural and it is wrong to link it with patriotism. According to him, judging religious faith from a political perspective gives a wrong message to society.

Is this matter being linked to the past?

After this controversy, some religious leaders have also linked it to the policies of the era of General Zia-ul-Haq. Syed Jawad Naqvi said that like that time, an atmosphere of pressure seems to be forming again. He alleges that now the definition of patriotism is being presented in a narrow manner.

Are questions being raised on the policies of the army?

Some Ulemas also allege that efforts are being made to suppress those who question the military's strategic policies, especially decisions related to foreign powers. He says that linking disagreement with anti-nationalism is a dangerous trend, which can further complicate the situation.